Can we say GIVERS and TAKERS?

Life is way too short to spend a lot of time and energy on the takers of the world. Generally their intentions are selfish, and the only interests they look after are their own.

Corporations, if they never give back to the community, are doing the same thing. We should not support those that NEVER give back.

Some companies such as Ben and Jerry’s (Before sellout) and Newman’s Own have been wildly successful while giving back extensively to charity and the community. Target is another company with a plan for giving.

we all know about karma, the law of moral causation whereby an action causes an entire cycle of cause and effect. in buddhism the effects of all actions are viewed as actively shaping one’s past present and future experiences. in other words you…

the london g20 summit obviously got me thinking, first in terms of a new world order, see my previous post, and now in terms of what it would mean to world currencies.
we have now lived for roughly sixty years with the $ as our world currency, the us b…

i have been more nervous, concerned, leery, even peeved, ok, plain steaming with every new financial bailout plan. a couple of paulson plans, now a couple of geithner plans, and i still get the uneasy feeling that the banking/financial sector is becom…

behind every winning strategy lies a killer app, a competitive edge, a “super gun” so to speak. it turns out that even elizabeth i’s navy had such a “super gun”, literally, when defeating the spanish armada, see here. el…

when and where the worlds of politics and economics meet bewilderment often ensues. take most developing countries. when their banking system is in crisis, or their currency on the run, a trade imbalance, near bankruptcy, huge debt whether public or …

oops, and here i thought i was original with my previous post on transformational shifts, read it here… until i read this post.
oh well!!!

……